<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>LED Therapy Center</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com</link>
	<description>Your solution for Acne, Balding and Wrinkles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:54:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Grow Hair, Produce Collagen, Clear Acne</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/grow-hair-produce-collagen-clear-acne/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/grow-hair-produce-collagen-clear-acne/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=369</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Califronia Doctor validates the POWER of LED.  The LED Therapy Center uses these Safe and Powerful LED lights for Acne, Balding and Wrinkles.  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFUTBDJkbJM]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Califronia Doctor validates the POWER of LED.  The LED Therapy Center uses these Safe and Powerful LED lights for Acne, Balding and Wrinkles. </p>
<p><a title="Grow Hair and Produce Collagen" href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFUTBDJkbJM" target="_self">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFUTBDJkbJM</a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/grow-hair-produce-collagen-clear-acne/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hair Loss, Thinning Hair, Safe &amp; Effective Solution</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/hair-loss-thinning-hair-safe-effective-solution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/hair-loss-thinning-hair-safe-effective-solution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 14:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Balding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alopecia, hairloss, Laser, Low-Level Laser Therapy, Medical Treatment for Hair Loss and Balding. 15 to 30 minutes treatments on alternating days for 2 to 4 weeks, tapering to one to two treatments per week for 6 to 12 months, followed by bi-weekly and once per month maintenance treatments. *  LED lights (low laser) increase blood [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.sunetics.com/pdf/ThecurrentroleoflaserinMPHL_JCLT.pdf" target="_self">Alopecia, hairloss, Laser, Low-Level Laser Therapy, Medical Treatment for Hair Loss and Balding.</a></p>
<p>15 to 30 minutes treatments on alternating days for 2 to 4 weeks, tapering to one to two treatments per week for 6 to 12 months, followed by bi-weekly and once per month maintenance treatments.</p>
<p>*  LED lights (low laser) increase blood flow at the dermal papilla<br />
*  LED lights are safeand have a positive impact on most patients<br />
*  Many report a change in texture and quality of their hair<br />
*  Aids in  pre and  post-surgical hair transplanted hair</p>
<p>The proper Light wave and duration of LED light exposure is instrumental in success hair regrowth. </p>
<p>Call the LED Therapy Center today for your  FREE <strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">IN-HOUSE</span> </strong>CONSULATION.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #0000ff;"><strong>214-548-3787</strong></span></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/hair-loss-thinning-hair-safe-effective-solution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fat, Weight Loss and Liver Detox</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/fat-weight-loss-and-liver-detox/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/fat-weight-loss-and-liver-detox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weight Loss]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.annlouise.com/fat-flush/overview/the-fat-flush-plan-overview.html  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.annlouise.com/fat-flush/overview/the-fat-flush-plan-overview.html">http://www.annlouise.com/fat-flush/overview/the-fat-flush-plan-overview.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annlouise.com/fat-flush/overview/the-fat-flush-plan-overview.html"></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.annlouise.com/fat-flush/overview/the-fat-flush-plan-overview.html"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.annlouise.com/fat-flush/overview/the-fat-flush-plan-overview.html"></a></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/fat-weight-loss-and-liver-detox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why and How LED for Anti-Aging works so well</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/why-and-how-led-for-anti-aging-works-so-well/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/why-and-how-led-for-anti-aging-works-so-well/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading Light Emitting Diode and Photon absorption therapy (LED-PAT) LED-PAT researchers include, but not limited to are:  Ames Research Institute at NASA, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, UCLA Medical School, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine.   FDA has concluded that it is not possible to overexpose the skin to 633 nanometers [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Leading</strong> Light Emitting Diode and Photon absorption therapy (LED-PAT) <strong>LED-PAT researchers include</strong>, but not limited to are:  Ames Research Institute at NASA, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, UCLA Medical School, Johns Hopkins Medical Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>FDA has concluded</strong> that it is not possible to overexpose the skin to 633 nanometers (nm) of red light, regardless of exposure time and frequency of exposure.  <strong>Also, it is not possible to damage the eyes due to the wavelengths of light and intensity level of the light.</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>LED is a 100% Natural Skincare Regime that is <strong>Non-Laser, Non-Thermal, Non-Invasive and Non-Toxic</strong>.  There is <strong>No Recovery needed and is Pain Free</strong>.  Typically clients often report a heightened sense of well-being and relaxation during their sessions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>LED delivers a steady pure narrow-band of <strong>red light (633 nm)</strong> that activates a series of biological responses in the skin.  This light stimulates the building blocks required of the body to nourish, hydrate, detoxify, repair, strengthen and protect the skin. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>A variety of cell types make up the skins cellular matrix.  <strong>A person’s own metabolism will determine the rate at which cells naturally renew and repair themselves.</strong>  The body begins to manufacture the important building blocks of the skin, <strong>such as collagen and elastin when exposed to red light (633 nm</strong>), however, basic raw materials are necessary for the body to build from and repair skin cells:  water, nutrients, sleep, etc. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The primary reason skin exhibits visible signs of aging are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Decreased cellular energy (metabolism)</li>
<li>Cells divide more slowly and the inner layer of the skin begins to thin</li>
<li>Fat cells begin to diminish</li>
<li>Decreased supply of water and nutrients</li>
<li>Excessive exposure to <strong>UVB</strong> (damages DNA)  and <strong>UVA</strong> (starts the oxidative process ~ Free Radicals) </li>
</ul>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>How does LED work?</strong>  <strong>Think of a Suntan.</strong>  Certain skins cells respond to specific wavelentghts of light.  Melanocytes are cells in the skin that respond and absorb light waves in the range of 290 to 320 nm (whitish-purple color also know as UVB light).  As the Melanocytes absorb the light from the sun, they convert into cellular energy,  become energized and begin to process the nutrients: Tyrosine, Arginine and Copper.  During this biochemical process of melanogenesis, <strong>melanin is produced and called a Suntan.</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Skin exposure to 633 nm (red light) skin cells begin the natural biochemical process to produce collagen, elastin and certain enzymes that are imperative to the skins supportive structure</strong>.  <strong>Pores </strong>in the skin are purged through enhanced lymphatic drainage of bacterial debris and begin to reduce in size.  Vascular walls of the skin’s small blood vessels are also strengthened and result in improved <strong>oxygenation and detoxification </strong>of the skin.  <strong>Hydration</strong> increases.  <strong>Cellular activity is improved</strong> and the natural repair and creation of healthy skin cells begins. </p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>Effects of 633 nm (red light) on the skin:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Fibroblast cells absorb red light and convert to cellular energy</li>
<li>Collagen and elastin production begins</li>
<li>Increases lymphatic drainage</li>
<li>Circulation is increased</li>
<li>Intensive hydration and moisture retention begin</li>
<li>Cellular regeneration</li>
<li>Increased cell membrane permeability (absorption of water and nutrients)</li>
</ul>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/why-and-how-led-for-anti-aging-works-so-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LED for Acne and Scaring</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/led-for-acne-and-scaring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/led-for-acne-and-scaring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The LED Therapy Center works with several Plastic Suregons in the DFW area and recommends Laser and MicroDermbrasion for deep acne scars.  However, once you have been exposed to ANY TYPE of LASER or MicroDerm, you must and I repeat must call the LED Therapy Center for an LED Light Session (or find someone in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<h3>The LED Therapy Center works with several Plastic Suregons in the DFW area and recommends Laser and MicroDermbrasion for deep acne scars.  However, once you have been exposed to ANY TYPE of LASER or MicroDerm, you must and I repeat must call the LED Therapy Center for an LED Light Session (or find someone in your area) to protect your skin after any ablative, skin resurfacing procedure immediately AFTER.  The combination of both (laser and LED) will give you results beyond even your doctors expitations.  Call the LED Therapy Center today 214-587-3786 for recommendations of a reputable Plastic Surgeon or Aesthetician. </h3>
<h3><a onmousedown="return clk(this.href,'','','res','5','')" href="http://www.realself.com/question/does-led-light-treatment-work-acne-scars">Does <em>LED</em> light treatment work on <em>acne</em> scars?</a></h3>
<p><em>LED</em> treatments alone don&#8217;t do much for depressed <em>acne</em> scars. <em>LED</em> therapy does have a place in <em>acne</em> treatment, although most doctors don&#8217;t <strong>&#8230;</strong><br />
<cite>www.realself.com/&#8230;/does-<strong>led</strong>-light-treatment-work-<strong>acne</strong>-scars</cite></p>
<p><a rel="nofollow" href="http://us.mc506.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=vicki608@gmail.com" target="_blank"></a></div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/led-for-acne-and-scaring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LED for ACNE, Wrinkles and Viruses</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/led-for-acne-wrinkles-and-viruses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/led-for-acne-wrinkles-and-viruses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 12:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LED Information]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Light that can cure you Exciting new research provides doctors with an alternative treatment to drugs or surgery for ailments ranging from acne to Alzheimer&#8217;s. By Reed Karaim http://www.usaweekend.com/07_issues/070204/070204health.html First and Last Name Email Phone Number City and State Comments or Questions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: small; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Light that can cure you</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><strong>Exciting new research provides doctors with an alternative treatment to drugs or surgery for ailments ranging from acne to Alzheimer&#8217;s.</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small; font-family: verdana, arial, helvetica, sans-serif;"><em>By Reed Karaim</em></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.usaweekend.com/07_issues/070204/070204health.html" target="_blank">http://www.usaweekend.com/07_issues/070204/070204health.html</a></p>
<div id='formBuilderCSSIDRegister_for_Free_Hand_Spa_Here'>
<form class='formBuilderForm' id='formBuilderRegister_for_Free_Hand_Spa_Here' action='/feed/#formBuilderCSSIDRegister_for_Free_Hand_Spa_Here' method='post' onsubmit='return fb_disableForm(this);'><input type='hidden' name='formBuilderForm[FormBuilderID]' value='1' /><div id='formbuilder-page-1' title='formbuilder-page-1'>
<div class='formBuilderField single_line_text_box' id='formBuilderFieldFirst_and_Last_Name' title='Missing Information Please enter First and Last Name' ><a name='formBuilderFieldFirst_and_Last_Name'></a>
<span id='formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldFirst_and_Last_Name'></span>
<div class='formBuilderLabelRequired'>First and Last Name </div>
<div class='formBuilderInput'><input type='text' name='formBuilderForm[First_and_Last_Name]' value='' id='fieldformBuilderFieldFirst_and_Last_Name' onblur="fb_ajaxRequest('http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/formbuilder/php/formbuilder_parser.php', 'formid=1&amp;fieldid=1&amp;val='+document.getElementById('fieldformBuilderFieldFirst_and_Last_Name').value, 'formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldFirst_and_Last_Name')"/></div>
</div>
<div class='formBuilderField single_line_text_box' id='formBuilderFieldEmail' title='Please confirm your e-mail address' ><a name='formBuilderFieldEmail'></a>
<span id='formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldEmail'></span>
<div class='formBuilderLabelRequired'>Email </div>
<div class='formBuilderInput'><input type='text' name='formBuilderForm[Email]' value='' id='fieldformBuilderFieldEmail' onblur="fb_ajaxRequest('http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/formbuilder/php/formbuilder_parser.php', 'formid=1&amp;fieldid=2&amp;val='+document.getElementById('fieldformBuilderFieldEmail').value, 'formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldEmail')"/></div>
</div>
<div class='formBuilderField single_line_text_box' id='formBuilderFieldPhone' title='Please confirm your phone number' ><a name='formBuilderFieldPhone'></a>
<span id='formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldPhone'></span>
<div class='formBuilderLabelRequired'>Phone Number </div>
<div class='formBuilderInput'><input type='text' name='formBuilderForm[Phone]' value='' id='fieldformBuilderFieldPhone' onblur="fb_ajaxRequest('http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/formbuilder/php/formbuilder_parser.php', 'formid=1&amp;fieldid=3&amp;val='+document.getElementById('fieldformBuilderFieldPhone').value, 'formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldPhone')"/></div>
</div>
<div class='formBuilderField single_line_text_box' id='formBuilderFieldCity_and_State' title='Please confirm your phone number' ><a name='formBuilderFieldCity_and_State'></a>
<span id='formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldCity_and_State'></span>
<div class='formBuilderLabelRequired'>City and State </div>
<div class='formBuilderInput'><input type='text' name='formBuilderForm[City_and_State]' value='' id='fieldformBuilderFieldCity_and_State' onblur="fb_ajaxRequest('http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/formbuilder/php/formbuilder_parser.php', 'formid=1&amp;fieldid=4&amp;val='+document.getElementById('fieldformBuilderFieldCity_and_State').value, 'formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldCity_and_State')"/></div>
</div>
<div class='formBuilderField single_line_text_box' id='formBuilderFieldComments_or_Quesitons' title='Please enter Comment or Question' ><a name='formBuilderFieldComments_or_Quesitons'></a>
<span id='formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldComments_or_Quesitons'></span>
<div class='formBuilderLabelRequired'>Comments or Questions </div>
<div class='formBuilderInput'><input type='text' name='formBuilderForm[Comments_or_Quesitons]' value='' id='fieldformBuilderFieldComments_or_Quesitons' onblur="fb_ajaxRequest('http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/formbuilder/php/formbuilder_parser.php', 'formid=1&amp;fieldid=5&amp;val='+document.getElementById('fieldformBuilderFieldComments_or_Quesitons').value, 'formBuilderErrorSpaceformBuilderFieldComments_or_Quesitons')"/></div>
</div>
<div class='formBuilderSubmit'><input type='submit' name='Submit' value='Send!' /></div>
</div>
</form></div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/led-for-acne-wrinkles-and-viruses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Alkalized</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/get-alkalized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/get-alkalized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 13:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Alkalize or Die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alkaline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pH and you]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever wondered if the diseases in our society have a common cause? Many doctors, herbalists, and nutritionists believe that the explanation may come down to two small words: Acid / Alkaline High acidity can become a dangerous condition that weakens all major body systems. It makes your internal environment conducive to disease. A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Have you ever wondered if the diseases in our society have a common cause? Many doctors, herbalists, and nutritionists believe that the explanation may come down to two small words:</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Acid / Alkaline</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>High acidity can become a dangerous condition that weakens all major body systems</strong>. It makes your internal environment conducive to disease. A pH-balanced environment, on the other hand, allows proper metabolic functioning and gives your body resistance to disease. A healthy body maintains alkaline reserves that are used to meet emergency demands.</p>
<p><strong>pH measures the balance between positively and negatively charged ions in the body fluids, i.e. blood, urine and saliva.</strong> A low pH number (below 7) indicates that your body fluid is on the acidic side. A high pH number (above 7) indicates you have alkalinity. A pH of 7.0 is considered neutral; this is the pH of distilled water. This delicate balance can be an important indicator of overall health.</p>
<p>Researchers find that <strong>most people are at least slightly &#8220;acidic&#8221;; their pH is low</strong>. If your pH is too acidic, your body <strong>borrows minerals &#8211; such as calcium, magnesium, potassium and sodium -</strong> from vital organs and bones <strong>to neutralize and remove the acid</strong>. Although high acidity may not be outwardly noticeable, it can severely affect overall health in a negative way. <strong>Alkalinity in the body is much more rare, but just as potentially serious.</strong> It often takes longer for a person who is &#8220;alkaline&#8221; to achieve balance than one who is &#8220;acidic.&#8221;</p>
<p>The concept of acid alkaline imbalance as the cause of disease is not new. <strong>In 1933 a New York doctor named William Howard Hay published a ground-breaking book, &#8220;A New Health Era&#8221;</strong> in which he maintains that all disease is cause by <strong>autointoxication (or &#8220;self-poisoning&#8221;) due to acid accumulation</strong> in the body:</p>
<p><strong><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">&#8220;Now we depart from health in just the proportion to which we have allowed our alkalies to be dissipated by introduction of acid-forming food in too great amount&#8230; It may seem strange to say that all disease is the same thing, no matter what its myriad modes of expression, but it is verily so.&#8221;</span></em></strong> <strong>William Howard Hay, M.D.</strong></p>
<p><strong>More recently, in his remarkable book Alkalize or Die (see recommended reading), Dr. Theodore A. Baroody says essentially the same thing:</strong> <strong><em><span style="color: #0000ff;">&#8220;The countless names of illnesses do not really matter. What does matter is that they all come from the same root cause&#8230;too much tissue acid waste in the body!&#8221;</span></em> Theodore A. Baroody, N.D., D.C., Ph.D.</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Understanding pH</span></strong></p>
<p><strong>pH (potential of hydrogen) is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution.</strong> It is measured on a scale of <strong>0 to 14</strong> &#8212; the lower the pH the more acidic the solution, the higher the pH the more alkaline (or base) the solution. When a solution is neither acid nor alkaline it has a pH of 7, which is neutral.</p>
<p><strong>Water is the most abundant compound in the human body, comprising 70% of the body.</strong> The body has an acid-alkaline (or acid-base) ratio called the pH, which is a balance between <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">positively </span>charged ions (acid-forming)</strong> and <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">negatively </span>charged ions (alkaline-forming.)</strong> The body continually strives to balance pH. When this balance is compromised many problems can occur.</p>
<p>It is important to understand that we are not talking about stomach acid or the pH of the stomach. <strong>We are talking about the pH of the body&#8217;s fluids and tissues</strong>, which is an entirely different matter.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.reynoldsoffice.com/ph.htm" target="_blank">To Learn more from Sue Reynolds M.S.W. Master Herbalist &#8211; Click Here</a></strong></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/get-alkalized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-Aging</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/led-for-anti-aging-no-pain-downtime-irritation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/led-for-anti-aging-no-pain-downtime-irritation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LED Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Balding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LED treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treatment for Rosacea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrinkles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LED (light emitting diodes) is quickly gaining popularity in the area of Anti-Aging for Wrinkles, Balding, Acne, and Scarring in both the medical and aesthetic fields.  With over 12 years of clinical research, 60 plus clinical papers and 6 FDA clearances the The LED Therapy Center has done its research on which LED equipment provides [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://miinews.com/pdf/1004_current_led.pdf" target="_blank">LED</a></strong> (light emitting diodes) is quickly gaining popularity in the area of Anti-Aging for Wrinkles, Balding, Acne, and Scarring in both the medical and aesthetic fields. </p>
<p>With over <strong>12 years of clinical research, 60 plus clinical papers and 6 FDA clearances the</strong> The <strong><a href="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/" target="_blank">LED Therapy Center </a></strong>has done its research on which LED equipment provides the <strong>optimal wavelength and intensity</strong> to target and reverse the signs of aging, balding, and acne.  </p>
<p>Understanding how &#8220;light&#8221; interacts with the body (the body needs light to thrive and heal) The LED Therapy Center uses LED equipment/lights based on many years of medical research. Dr. Colin Whitehurst was commissioned by Cancer Research U.K. to develop a device that delivered effective <strong>&#8220;light therapy&#8221; </strong>for the treatment of <strong>skin cancers</strong> over 25 years ago.  His research revealed how to optimize the interaction between light energy (photons) and the cell.  <strong>Now with over 60 independent peer reviewed publications from leading physicians effective protocols</strong> have been established for treatments.</p>
<p>The best part about LED lights from the LED Therapy Center is that they <strong>work with the body&#8217;s own biochemistry</strong> to reverse the signs and effects of aging.  Cells with receptors for absorbing light in the form of energy (photons) react by consuming the light waves which stimulate normal cellular processes.  Exposure to LED accelerates and<strong> improves the natural repair and immune response </strong>of cells to <strong>regenerate and proliferate.</strong>   <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Proper</span></strong> wavelength, intensity and exposure combined, prove to <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">optimize LED results</span></strong>. </p>
<p>And, the <strong>results keep accumulating over time.</strong>  LED treatments affect the cell deep in the dermis (skin) where skin cells are born. By igniting or turning on the energy (ATP) of the cell, fibroblast begin to awaken dormant collagen and elastin strands.  Clinical studies have reported a <strong>74% improvement</strong> in periorbitral wrinkles and <strong>84% in skin</strong> clarity and smoothness.  LED lights from the LED Therapy Center provide optimal fuel for dying head hair follicles, collagen and elastin production and so much more. </p>
<p><strong><em>Finally there is hope for Acne suffers</em></strong> who have tried it all.  LED lights prove to exceed all previous treatments and solutions.  By killing the bacteria (<strong>core cause</strong>) that feed on the sebaceous oil (<strong>causing inflammation</strong>) and purging the pores of impurities, the skin heals.  With no pain, no downtime, no red irritated or scabby skin, LED’s shine in the area of acne solutions and treatments.  <strong><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Plus </span>the anti-aging effects</em></strong> from LED give acne prone skin the best way to fade discoloration, shrink pores and scars!</p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/led-for-anti-aging-no-pain-downtime-irritation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eliminate Cellulite</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/93/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/93/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 06:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Weight Loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellulite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fat pockets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lypmh drainage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=93</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eliminate Cellulite The lumpy-bumpy appearance of cellulite has been difficult to get rid of because blood circulation is restricted in these isolated fat pockets. Without ample blood flow, the body cannot metabolize the cellulite and dispose of it. Using intense vibrations the cellulite massager breaks up the pockets of fat underneath your skin unlike any [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="link" href="http://www.photorejuvenationtherapy.com/store/2257437/product/PRT02b"></a></p>
<table style="width: 533px; height: 201px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> <span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Eliminate Cellulite</strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">The lumpy-bumpy appearance of cellulite has been difficult to get rid of because blood circulation is restricted in these isolated fat pockets. Without ample blood flow, the body cannot metabolize the cellulite and dispose of it. Using intense vibrations the cellulite massager breaks up the pockets of fat underneath your skin unlike any other cellulite reducing machine. Continuous usage will result in smooth, even skin in no time.</span> </span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<div id="element_4" class="layout"><a class="link" href="http://www.photorejuvenationtherapy.com/store/2257437/product/PRT17"><span class="text"></p>
<table style="width: 533px; height: 243px;" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><span style="font-size: x-small;"><a href="http://www.photorejuvenationtherapy.com/store/2257437/product/PRT17"><br />
</a></span></td>
<td><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;"><strong>ALL IN ONE Anti Aging, Cellulite, Lypmh Drainage PLUS</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: helvetica; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana;">Equipped with an LCD display, use 10-20 minutes per day on each problem area. The device includes treatment for wrinkles, sunspots, dark circles, and large pores. It renerates new skin cells under the surface, forces your skin to repair itself, kills pollution on your face and tests the improvement of moisture over time. Use on your body to smooth cellulite, tighten and firm problem areas, loosen tense, aching muscles and flush out toxins. Speed the healing process of injuries and lighten scars. You can&#8217;t get this product anywhere else it is the only thing you need to look your best!</span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></span></a></div>
<div id="element_5" class="layout"><a class="link" href="http://www.photorejuvenationtherapy.com/store/2257437/product/SB-04"><span class="text"></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><a href="http://www.photorejuvenationtherapy.com/store/2257437/product/SB-04"><br />
</a></td>
<td><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"><strong>Improve Muscle Tone, Reduce Access Fat, Relieve Sore Tired Muscles, Promote Relaxation!</strong></span> </span></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; color: #0000ff; font-size: x-small;"><span style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">Using high</span> speed vibration, this massager is a powerful product to soften and reduce excess fat, eliminate muscle tiredness, release physical pain, accelerate blood circulation and even prevent hair loss if you massage your scalp with this product. The Slim Handy Massager helps to drain toxins, tones muscles and promotes an overall sense of well-being.</span></span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p></span></a></div>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/93/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conditions helped by LED</title>
		<link>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/conditions-helped-by-led/</link>
		<comments>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/conditions-helped-by-led/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 04:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Knutson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[LED Information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ankle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bruise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[face]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macular]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scrapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ulcers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wounding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/?p=76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conditions and Injuries Helped by LEDs Conditions known to be helped by LED light therapy osteoarthritis sports injuries such as knee, ankle, shoulder, etc burns, scrapes, and pain relief from cuts ulcers macular degeneration laser burns to the retina fibromyalgia pains preventing bruising and inflammation if it&#8217;s fresh injury bunion pain diabetic neuropathy tendinitis myofascial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="conditions">Conditions and Injuries Helped by LEDs</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="conditions"><strong>Conditions known to be helped by LED light therapy</strong> </a></span></p>
<ul><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li><a name="conditions">osteoarthritis </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">sports injuries such as knee, ankle, shoulder, etc </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">burns, scrapes, and pain relief from cuts </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">ulcers </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">macular degeneration </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">laser burns to the retina </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">fibromyalgia pains </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">preventing bruising and inflammation if it&#8217;s fresh injury </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">bunion pain </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">diabetic neuropathy </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">tendinitis </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">myofascial pain </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">minimize recent nerve injury </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">wound healing, especially in diabetics </a></li>
<li><a name="conditions">bursitis </a></li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="conditions"><strong>Conditions LED light therapy may or may not help</strong> </a></span></p>
<ul><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="conditions"> </a></p>
<li><a name="conditions">wrinkles, aging, acne, spots (see </a>skin section)</li>
<li>bone healing (it might help)</li>
<li>existing bruises and inflammation</li>
<li>back pains (hit or miss)</li>
<li>rosacea, psoriasis, eczema, dermatitis, poison ivy</li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Conditions LED light therapy does not help</strong> </span></p>
<ul><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li>headache</li>
<li>muscle ache from working out</li>
<li>infection</li>
<li>scars</li>
<li>bunion reduction</li>
<li>reverse osteoarthritis bone deformation</li>
<li>any injury too deep or beneath bone like the brain</li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">FDA allows advertising red and infrared for minor pains and mild arthritis.  Red has been used to help halt dry macular degeneration which may have FDA approval.  The following have FDA approval for specific devices: infrared 880 nm for diabetic peripheral neuropathy, 660 nm red for mouth ulcers in children on a type of chemo, &#8220;Titan&#8221; intense infrared device for wrinkles in a clinical setting, very intense (harmful) infrared devices for spots, and blue or blue/red for acne.  There have been excellent results reported for tendonitis, shoulders, knees, small joints, and fibromyalgia.  For most soft-tissue injuries beneath the skin, the pain goes from an 8 to a 2 (on a scale of 10) after an hour or two of treatment with good home-use LED devices.  For exposed injuries like burns and retina injuries, only 1 to 10 minutes of LED light is used, depending on the device.   Applying LED light for too long cancels the benefits, so the time of application is hard to determine and important: too little light and there is little benefit, and too much light and there is no benefit.  The pain relief can be amazing in burns, cuts, and other wounds even if wound healing is not faster.  The increase in the speed of healing can be directly measured in the injured retinas of rabbit.  It does not help bruises.  Stubbed toes can go from being purple-black to pink in one treatment.  Serious injuries seem to benefit from 3 to 6 treatments/day (as the pain returns) instead of one treatment/day.  Strangely, tendons sore from working-out seem to not receive any pain relief, but chronic tendinitis seems to benefit greatly.  It is beneficial only about 30% of the time in back pain.  Companies have made various strange claims: yellow for wrinkles, green for cancer, and blue for wrinkles.  Recent serious injuries benefit from several treatments per day. <a name="why"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="why">Why does it work?</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="why">The wavelengths from 600 to 900 nm pass through blood and water in tissue more easily than other wavelengths.  About 35% of the energy in this range is absorbed by a specific &#8220;proton pump&#8221; (cytochrome c oxidase, CCO, &#8220;complex IV&#8221;) in mitochondria.  The light at 4 specific wavelengths &#8220;kick-start&#8221; the CCO pump into producing more cellular energy, ATP.  The CCO pump is very similar in all animals because it evolved from light-assisted bacteria that were part of the first mitochondria.  The absorption spectrum of blood suddenly drops off to allow these wavelengths to pass through which indicates the evolution of hemoglobin may have been influenced by cells benefiting from these wavelengths.  The immediate increase in respiration that sun causes by this mechanism may help animals increase their activity during the day, in addition to the heat provided by the sun that promotes the release of oxygen (myoglobin also absorbs these wavelengths).  These wavelengths of the Sun can provide the optimum 4 J/cm^2 at a depth of 1 inch (using 1% transmission) after 4 hours of exposure in bright Sun, reaching all skin and a large percentage of muscle tissue in historically-thin humans with minimal clothing.</a></span></p>
<p><a name="why"><strong>Evolution Theory Support: </strong>There are 5 indications that the benefit of red and near-infrared light is not an accident, but a highly &#8220;intelligent&#8221; and natural result of evolution. The indications are: 1) The proton pump is the last in a series of 3 pumps which places it in possibly the best location to pull the food conversion process along by &#8220;pushing&#8221; the final electrons through the chain. This creates electrostatic pull on the electrons further back in the chain. 2) The pump absorbs primarily the red and near-infrared light and the remaining sunlight wavelengths are blocked by water and blood. 3) The pump is the primary absorber of these wavelengths in the body, very roughly about 35%. 4) Oxygenated hemoglobin has a very sharp decline in it&#8217;s ability to absorb red and near-infrared which indicates hemoglobin evolved specifically to allow these wavelengths to pass through. The CCO pump has a longer evolutionary history than hemoglobin because it was inherited from bacteria that formed the symbiotic relationship in mitochondria. Decendents of these bacteria still exist as purple bacteria which are used in most research on the CCO pump. 5) Night-time levels of melatonin, but not day-time levels, have been shown by Tiina Karu to completely inhibit the positive effects of infrared light. This indicates that melatonin and its wide swings over 24 hours could have evolved to not inhibit the benefits of sunlight.</a></p>
<p><a name="why"><strong>Details on cytochrome c oxidase:</strong> As the CCO absorbs light, its two copper atoms are either oxidized or reduced to transport electrons that are required to help pump H+ to increase the gradient that allows for more ATP.  This increases respiration (krebs cycle molecules provide the energy). Calcium Ca<sup>2+</sup>, alkalinity (0.2 units), and oxidation are increased which causes important secondary responses such as transcription factors that increase DNA and RNA activity.  The creation of more ATP increases respiration that increases the production of O-2 oxidation which can be harmful if too much light is applied.  Daily moderate use of light therapy induces up-regulation of antioxidants like MnSOD to counteract the harmful oxidation of O<sup>2-</sup> in a manner much like </a>moderate exercise.  Resveratrol has a similar action via SIRT1/NAD+ &#8211;&gt;FOX3a&#8211;&gt;MnSOD.  Like resveratrol and nicotinamide, light therapy increases NAD+ which is known to increase endurance as well as increase MnSOD.  Over the short-term, heavy exercise depletes NAD+ but light exercise increases it (ref).  Light therapy increases GSH (glutathione) which decreases H2O2 that is produced from the extra MnSOD that is converting O-2 to H2O2.  Too much wide-spectrum infrared light, such as that received from 3 hours of bright sunlight, causes too much H2O2 which will increase MMP-1 (at least in the dermis of the skin) which some researchers think could cause photo-aging, but not cancer.<!--  &nbsp;I do not know if resveratrol or exercise increase MMP-1 (as a result of increasing MnSOD and thereby H2O2), but they both are definitely not aging factors. --> <!--  &nbsp;Extra MMP-1 may cause other genes to be expressed to counteract it, or they may be expressed concomitant with the MMP-1 as a result of the H2O2. --></p>
<p><!-- By creating an "electron drain" in complex IV (CCO), super oxide O<sup>2-</sup> may be decreased directly by an electrostatic pull on cytochrome c and thereby on complex III, preventing electron leakage that is believed to result in super oxide O<sup>2-</sup>. &nbsp; &#8211;> The chemical NO is prevented from halting CCO activity and this may explain the immediate pain relief.  More electrons being transported to create ATP oxidizes (&#8220;alkalinizes&#8221;) the entire mitochondria, increasing the ratios NAD<sup>+</sup>/NADH, NADP<sup>+</sup>/NADPH, GSH/GSSG and signaling important secondary effects such as transcription factors which signal more DNA and RNA.  The idea that 600 to 900 nm wavelengths activate cytochrome c oxidase was first proposed 20 years ago by Tiina Karu in 1988.   See her 2003 great summary for more about light therapy and CCO.</p>
<p>CCO absorbs energy from the 600-900 nm photons and reflects them with a slightly longer wavelength (approx 50 nm longer), extracting about 0.1 eV of energy in helping to create 0.42 eV in a molecule of ATP.  If CCO in the body is able to absorb 10% of the 1E17 photons/cm^2 in the 600-900 nm range from bright Sun over 1 m^2 of skin for 4 hours, then the human body has gained about 6 kcalories, making us 1.8% photosynthetic during those 4 hours.  The light is directly photo-assisting in the creation of the ATP chemical energy. This does not include the calories absorbed from light that reduces the need for maintaining body temperature or required for cooling.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/ETC.gif" alt="" /></span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="str"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="str">LED Array Strength</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="str">LED strength in &#8220;mcd&#8221; is meaningless.  The plastic bulb of LEDs can focus the light to a bright point that has a high mcd rating but as soon as it passes through the skin it&#8217;s dispersed again as if it were never focused.  The important rating is the power per square cm in units of mW/cm^2.  A higher mW/cm^2 means less application time is needed.  If the manufacturer used good engineering skills to choose the least expensive power supply, then the wattage of the power supply should be about 2 or 3 times more than the total light energy output of their LED array.  The maximum total light output of a device is about 1/3 to 1/2 the wattage (W=Volt x Amps) of the transformer.  The mW/cm^2 is the total light energy in mW divided by the length and width of the array in cm.  Your cheek can barely feel the warmth after a few seconds of 30 mW/cm^2 in the 630 to 880 range and 200 mW/cm^2 can make dark skin hot (&gt; 105 F) after 5 minutes.  Dark skin gets much warmer than light skin. </a><a name="dosage"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="dosage">Healing Dosage and Application Time</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="dosage">Several journal articles indicate about 4 Joules of energy (J) applied to each 1 cm by 1 cm area (1 cm^2) once or twice per day is the best dosage for healing cells that are directly exposed to the light.  At 8 J/cm^2, the dosage may be too high and there will be less benefit than at 4 J/cm^2.  LED devices specifications should always include W/cm^2 so that the application time can be calculated.  A Joule (J) is a Watt (W) applied for 1 second. So 4 J/cm^2 is the same as applying an LED device with a strength of 0.03 W/cm^2 for 133 seconds (133 seconds x 0.03 W/cm^2 = 4 J/cm^2).  The only benefit of stronger LED devices is a shorter treatment time.  To help tissue that is 1 cm beneath the skin, a much long application time is needed.  It is very difficult to know how much light is being blocked by tissue, but 1 cm of tissue allows roughly only 10% of the light through. So 10 times as energy (Joules) is required to treat tissue that is 1 cm deep compared to tissue at the surface of the skin, or 10 x 4 = 40 J/cm^2. For a 0.03 W/cm^2 LED device, 40/0.03 = 1333 seconds = 22 minutes.  This dosage can be applied twice a day and is not harmful to tissue except for the eyes (LED devices should not be pointed directly into the eyes for more than a minute).  Dark skin may require twice as much time because it blocks roughly twice as much light.   About 1000 J/cm^2 is needed to reach injured cells 2.54 cm (1 inch) below the skin, and higher doses could be dangerous.  For this reason, LED devices are probably not very useful for injuries more than 1 inch deep, but they have been very useful for knee and shoulder injuries on professional basketball teams.</a></span></p>
<p><a name="dosage">Our ancestors have been exposed to 0.005 to 0.03 W/cm^2 of sunlight in the red to near-infrared range for up to 10 hours a day, giving an average daily dosage in the hundreds of J/cm^2.  This is theoretical support for the idea that 1000 J/cm^2 is not unreasonable in a clinical setting.  I have found 100 J/cm^2 to reduce pains that are about 1/2 inch deep from an pain level of 8 to 2. I have not observed any harm from 30 minutes of 200 mW/cm^2 (360 J/cm^2) at 850 nm, but this is 2 times more energy per cm^2 than the total energy (all wavelengths) of the brightest sun so it can definitely have heat problems and is not natural. </a><a name="opti"> </a></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="opti">Optimum Wavelengths</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="opti">Certain wavelengths provide a better biological response.  In short, CCO absorbs 4 peak areas of wavelengths (see figure below) in the 600-900 nm range that cover almost half of the 600-900 nm range. In an activated state, the CCO changes shape so that even more wavelengths are absorbed.  It uses this energy to increase ATP and place the cell in an alkaline or oxidized state that results in many secondary benefits. </a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="opti"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/opti.gif" alt="" /><br />
From T. Karu, </a>1996 and 2005</span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><br />
This wide range of wavelengths is specific evidence for the general evolutionary argument that a wide range of wavelengths exactly like the Sun is the best possible exposure.  However, there are three ways it might be possible to provide equal or greater benefit than the Sun for hypoxic or injured cells:  1) LEDs can provide injured cells with a larger amount of light in the beneficial range and at times when the sun is not available,  2) we can reduce the heat and thereby provide higher concentrations that reach deeper cells (the Sun is limited to about 1/2 to 1 inch of depth like most LED and laser units),  3) in the future an inexpensive device will be made that is specifically tuned to the CCO set of proteins, having a specific sequence of pulse times of specific wavelengths and pauses, forcing CCO through each step of its pumping action with minimal heat and maximum depth.</span></p>
<p>A single wavelength may work as good as full spectrum by causing an electrostatic push or pull on neighboring electrons when moving only one electron (into or out of one of the two copper atoms in CCO).  The electrostatic push and pull may cascade all the way through the electron transport chain.  Complex II activity has been shown to increase even though it does not absorb these wavelengths.</p>
<p>Many different wavelengths have been used, but very few studies have compared different wavelengths.  The figure above indicates wavelengths 610-625, 660-690, 750-770, and 815-860 nm are the best wavelengths.  Considerations other than how well they activate CCO are: 1) which wavelengths penetrate the best (see section on absorption), 2) which LEDs provide the strongest light output (keep in mind 850 nm has 30% more photons per watt than 630 nm), and 3) possibly 630 nm being usefully absorbed and reflected as (aka &#8220;converted to&#8221;) an 825 nm photon to be used again.</p>
<p>Inexpensive LEDs typically come in 630, 660, 850, and 880 nm with a hard-to-find (expensive) gap between 710 and 830 nm.  The peaks of the LEDs and optimum wavelengths are not exact, but spread out about +/- ~10 nm so there is an overlap of available LEDs and the biologically optimum wavelengths.  The 630 nm LED can affect the 620nm peak in the chart, and 660 nm LED touches the 680 nm peak, and 850 nm is directly on one peak, but does not cover the nearby peak 820-830 nm as well.<!-- &nbsp;The maximum absorbance of the copper atoms in CCO occurs in a wide range from 800 to 880 nm and peaks at 840 nm<sup><A HREF="http://www.hkjpaed.org/details.asp?id=376&#038;show=1234" mce_HREF="http://www.hkjpaed.org/details.asp?id=376&amp;show=1234">Jobsis-VanderVliet 1991</A></sup> indicating that 850 nm LEDs may be a great choice. &nbsp;But this may not be as important as the &#8220;biological activity&#8221; figure above that measured &#8220;attached cells&#8221;.  &nbsp;Currently, my preference is 850 nm LED for the above reasons, but the science indicates a mixture of 660 and 850 should do just as well and possibly better. &nbsp;I am currently experimenting with another wavelength to see if it is better. &#8211;>    <a name="deep"> </a></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="deep">Ability of Light to Penetrate Tissue</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="deep">Red and near-infrared light penetrate tissue because they are not blocked by blood or water as much as other wavelengths.  A doubling of the light intensity at any particular wavelength will double the amount of light energy that reaches a particular depth. Also, doubling the time of application will double the amount of light energy.  So if you use a device that is half as strong, you simply have to apply it twice as long.   Skin, fat, and muscle all have different absorption and scattering coefficients that change depending on the wavelength which causes this to be a very difficult subject.  Visible and infrared light does NOT travel through bone.</a></span></p>
<p><a name="deep">The question of what percentage of light is allowed through a particular tissue at a particular wavelength is very important, highly varied, and very complex.  For example, there are 5 layers in the epidermis and dermis that have distinctly different absorption and scattering properties that change based on the location and color of the skin.  All those variables change again based on the wavelength.  An even bigger problem is that usable and reliable data to plug into the equations is non-existent.  This is the situation for skin, which is always 1 mm or 1 to 4 mm thick, depending on which source you quote.  I have a </a>excel spreadsheet that tries to follow the methods of Steven L. Jacques and The Science of Phototherapy&#8221; but it&#8217;s pretty much useless.  Those sources state anywhere from 5% to 50% of the light in the 600-900 nm range is blocked by the epidermis and 5% to 95% is blocked by the dermis, and the only number for fatty tissue I have results in 99% being blocked by 1 cm.  <!--  &nbsp;About 95% of the light makes it through the 0.006 cm epidermis of very white skin (2% melanin) and about 17% of the remaining light energy makes it through the 1 mm dermis layer. &nbsp;Scattering from small collagen fibers and absorption in blood are the major factors in the dermis. &nbsp;Only 2% of the remaining light makes it through 0.9 cm of reasonably fatty tissue (numbers are from ). &nbsp;So the percentage of light that makes it to 1 cm deep is: 0.95 x 0.17 x 0.2 = 0.32% &nbsp;Therefore to get 4 J/cm^2 to injured cells that are 1 cm deep, 1300 J/cm^2 has to be applied at the skin surface ( 1300 = 4/0.0032) which is .  &nbsp;850 nm has only a small penetration advantage over 660 nm under these conditions. &nbsp;But if the skin color is very dark, the extra melanin allows only 20% of 660 nm through and 50% of 850 nm. &nbsp;So compared to very light skin, very dark skin requires twice as long for 850 nm and 5 times longer for 660. &nbsp;Since the melanin is near the surface and near heat sensors, dark skin will get hotter and feel hotter, so the light intensity cannot simply be increased to reduce the time. &nbsp; --></p>
<p>The graph below shows that wavelengths over 900 nm start to get blocked more and more by water.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/WATER2.gif" alt="" /></span></p>
<p>The graph below shows not much light is able to pass through oxygenated blood (HbO2) when the wavelength is less than 600 nm.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/HB_SR3.gif" alt="" /></span></p>
<p>Below is the same data, but INVERTED and expanded in our area of interest.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/BLOOD.gif" alt="" /></span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><br />
To use the absorption coefficient to find percent of light transmission through blood, use T = 2.718^(-d*A) where d is depth in cm and A is absorption coefficient.  This is simple absorption equation where light scattering coefficient is not taken into account (negligible for blood).  If there is scattering, replace A with SQRT(3A(A+0.8S)) where S is scattering coeff and 0.8 is anisotropy assumption.</span></p>
<p>Below is another interesting graph that shows that each mm of melanin in skin is very effective at blocking light, but that layer is very thin (less than 0.005 cm) compared to the small fiber collagen and hemoglobin in the dermis layer (0.1 cm).</p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/ABSORB.jpg" alt="" /></span></p>
<p><!-- <a href="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/ABSORB2.gif" mce_href="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/ABSORB2.gif">Here&#8217;s a similar HbO graph</a> and <a href="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/ABSORB3.gif" mce_href="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/ABSORB3.gif">another HbO and Hb</a> and <a href="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/HB_SR1.gif" mce_href="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/HB_SR1.gif">another with better units</a> and &#8211;> For the best info on HbO and Hb in blood see this.<!-- <A HREF="skin_hbo_best.mht" mce_HREF="skin_hbo_best.mht">here</A> or &#8211;> and also S Wray. Even if you understand the math, percent light transmission through tissue cannot be calculated unless you can find the %HbO and %Hb (or mM concentrations) in any particular tissue, along with the &#8220;baseline&#8221; (no blood) absorption and scattering of that tissue.  Do that first and please email me the link(s).</p>
<p><!-- <b>More useless comments on absorption:</b>&nbsp;Oxygenated blood (95% of blood) blocks 580 nm yellow with a factor of about 0.06 (unknown units) but it blocks 630 nm red about 200 times less, with a factor of about 0.0003. &nbsp;So mostly red and not the other colors are seen when we shine white light through our hand.  &nbsp; The blocking factor for blood is also low in the infrared. &nbsp;Water blocks 630 red 20 times more than 430 nm blue. &nbsp;This is why deep water is blue &#8211; our eyes perceive a lack of red as excess blue. &nbsp;But the effect seems minor until about 17 feet as any diver can tell you. &nbsp;I chose 17 instead of 10 or 20 because it helps with the following considerations: 880 infrared is blocked about 17 times more than 630 red, so 1 foot of water will block 880 infrared as much as 17 feet of clean water blocks 630 red. &nbsp;So 880 penetrates water well for at least half that much (6 inches). &nbsp;From 880 to 930, absorption increases another factor of 3, so I think 930 nm is still reasonable for penetrating 2 inches of water. &nbsp;To repeat, the absorption spectrum shows 2 inches of water blocks 930 infrared as much as 8 feet blocks 630 red (a factor of 50). &nbsp;So I believe the opaqueness of tissue blocks much more light than water for all of our red and near-infrared frequencies.  &nbsp;I&#8217;ve looked at a remote control (~920 nm) through 2 feet of water with the night vision of a camcorder and it was definitely much dimmer.  &nbsp;The Beer-Lambert law can be used for water, but for blood and tissue, there is a lot of scattering as well as absorption, so the law does not apply there as well. &#8211;> <strong>Useful Charts:</strong><br />
Water Absorption Factors, 200 nm to 990 nm<br />
Absorption Factor Chart   <a name="compare"> </a><a name="660"> </a></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="660">Comparing LED Wavelengths</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="660"><strong>660 nm verses 850 nm</strong><br />
Wavelengths greater than 800 nm penetrate tissue a little better than wavelengths shorter than 700 (see </a>Light Penetration section).  The effect is much larger in dark skin which will benefit more from 850 than from 660.  The question is complicated by different wavelengths having stronger or different biological responses (see Optimum Wavelengths section).  I don&#8217;t know if one is better than the other, but I currently have a preference for 850 nm over all others.  I am in the process of testing other wavelengths to see if I can find anything better than my best 850 device (shown below). </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/large.jpg" alt="" /></span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"> <a name="630"> <strong>660 nm verses 630 nm</strong><br />
630 is not as beneficial as 660, but it&#8217;s still a good wavelength at least for skin. 660 nm will penetrate deeper because 630 is blocked more by blood and collagen, and 660 nm has a better biological response.  630 nm red is slightly orange and 660 nm red is a &#8220;deeper&#8221; red.  Since 660 nm is almost infrared, the human eye is not able to see it as well.  630 nm red is used in key rings, traffic lights, and car tail-lights because it&#8217;s 6 times easier to see than 660 nm (see the </a>photopic response factor &#8211;  chart ).  The eye doesn&#8217;t suddenly stop sensing light at 700 nm, but it is a gradual decline in sensitivity.  You can see the healing and pain relief effect of light therapy by applying a laser pointer or a key ring light to small cuts for 2 minutes or to an arthritic finger joint for 20 minutes. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong>670 nm verses 660 nm</strong><br />
670 nm is more precisely tuned to help injured cells, but 660 nm may work better for deeper injuries. This is because 670 works so well and is absorbed so well, that it does not make it as deep as 660 nm. At some unknown depth, there will be 3 times as many 660 nm photons which overcomes the fact that each individual photon does not work as well as a 670 photon. Mathematically speaking, 670 nm works better by something like 30% but it&#8217;s exponentially decreasing in strength by something like 10% in the exponential. At some point, the exponential effect on the smaller 10% becomes larger than the 30%. For shallow injuries, 670 nm is definitely working faster, maybe 30% more beneficial, but 660 nm will work just as good if it&#8217;s applied 30% longer. This means that for the skin or cuts less than 2 mm deep, you would need to apply the 660 nm light 13 minutes instead of 10 minutes for the 670 nm. You save only 3 minutes by using the 670 nm. But for deep injuries more than 1/2 inch, where you might need to apply the 660 nm for an hour, you might need to apply the 670 nm for 2 hours &#8230; a huge difference. A similar discussion can be seen in the 830 nm verses 850 nm section below. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/EYE.gif" alt="" /></span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="850"> <strong>880 nm verses 850 nm</strong><br />
There are some companies that claim 880 is &#8220;the best&#8221; frequency.  I do not think that opinion is based on any scientific evidence.  880 LEDs are putting out frequencies in the range of 870 to 890 and are getting blocked 25% more by water absorption than 850 and the biological response to 880 nm is much less than at 850 nm (see </a>Optimum Wavelengths section).<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/270_LED.jpg" alt="" /></span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong>830 nm verses 850 nm</strong><br />
Judging from the biological response to different wavelengths, it would appear 830 nm is the best of all wavelengths. But 850 nm may be much better for deep tissue as explained below. The 830 nm LED is harder to find.</span></p>
<p>830 nm is better than 850 nm for shallow injuries and possibly better than 850 nm for up to 1/4 inch deep. 850 nm is better for deeper injuries because more 850 nm reaches deeper tissue. The CCO absorption is the source of all benefit, but 830 nm is being absorbed so well, that it does not make it very deep before all the light energy is absorbed. At some unknown depth, there will be 3 times as many 850 nm photons which overcomes the fact that each individual photon does not work as well as a 830 photon. Mathematically speaking, 830 nm works better by something like 30% but it&#8217;s exponentially decreasing in strength by something like 10% in the exponential. At some point, the exponential effect on the 10% becomes larger than the 30%. For shallow injuries, 830 nm is definitely working faster, maybe 30% more beneficial, but 850 nm will work just as good if it&#8217;s applied 30% longer. This means that for the skin or cuts less than 2 mm deep, you would need to apply the 850 nm light 13 minutes instead of 10 minutes for the 830 nm. You save only 3 minutes by using the 830 nm. But for deep injuries more than 1/2 inch, where you might need to apply the 850 nm for an hour, you might need to apply the 830 nm for 2 hours &#8230; a huge difference. A similar discussion is in the 660 nm verses 670 nm section above.</p>
<p>I can definitely feel more heat in my skin from 830 nm devices compared to 850 devices of the same power. This shows more light is being absorbed at a more superficial level. You can feel heat only in the skin, not beneath it, which shows the 830 energy did not make it as deep as 850 nm. My estimate is that at 1/4 inch, 850 nm is working as well as 830 nm. A 850 nm photon still isn&#8217;t as biologically active as an 830 nm photon at the deeper depths, but at 1/2 inch there may be 5 times more 850 nm photons due to 830 nm exponentially decreasing faster than 850 nm. Mathematically, relative biological response at depth N*x is CCO * [1-CCO-OTHER]^N where CCO is the fraction of light at a particular nm that is usefully absorbed by CCO in depth x, OTHER is the fraction of wasted absorption or wasted reflection occuring in depth x that is not part of the CCO fraction, and N is number of x depths. This is for homogenous tissue like muscle or fat.<!-- For example, let's say x=2 mm, CCO% at 830 nm = 35%, CCO% at 850 nm = 20%, OTHER% for both is 35%, and therefore the total light that makes it to 2 mm is 30% for 830 nm and 45% for 850 nm. This gives 7.6 times more photons for 850 nmIt's difficult to explain, but here's the mathematical proof.  You can think of "x" depth as 2 mm for a very rough approximation.  After "x" depth, let's say 35% of the 830 nm is absorbed by CCO and 35% is absorbed by other tissue elements so that 30% of the incoming light is remaining to reach deeper.  These percentages are accurate enough for this discussion.  For 850 nm, after the same "x" depth, roughly only 20% of 850 nm (verses 35% for 830 nm) is absorbed by CCO and 35% is still absorbed by other tissue elements.  This means 45% of the incoming 850 nm remains compared to the 30% of 830 nm. That's 50% more light for 850 nm at "x" depth.  But since 830 nm is being absorbed better by CCO, it still has a better biological response at the "x" depth (.   But after another "x" depth (2x total depth),  850 nm would have 1.3 times more light remaining to reach deeper  (1.3 comes from 0.45^2 / 0.30^2) and therefore working 1.3 * 20%/35% = 74% as good as 830 nm.  Then after a ANOTHER "x" depth (3x total depth), 850 nm would have 240% more light remaining to reach deeper, so that 850 nm works better than 830 nm at 3x depth by a factor of about 3 (240%/75%). So as you go deeper, more 850 nm is available which that overcomes it's smaller biological response per mW.  This discussion ignores skin difference issues and can be thought of what happens in any particular consistent tissue like fat or muscle.  This is not merely an obscure theoretical discussion.   880 nm is not better than 850 for the same reason because 880 nm has almost no biological response. --></p>
<p><a name="930"> <strong>930 nm and above</strong><br />
It appears any wavelength longer than 930 nm will start to have too much of its energy blocked by the water in tissue.  See the non-ablative part of the </a>skin section for how 1000-1500 nm can be used to burn the color out of spot and have other beneficial effects.     <a name="laser"> </a></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="laser">Laser Light verses LEDs</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="laser">There has been a lot of interest and money in low laser light therapy (LLLT) for healing, but there is no reason to believe that the coherent light from a laser is any better than LEDs, sunlight, or halogen lights.  Laser light does not penetrate more deeply and cells do not know the difference: all photons are the same and the benefits are based on the action of each individual photon, not on bulk properties such as all the photons having the same polarity and coherency.  The word &#8220;laser&#8221; has a superior marketing appeal for companies because it sounds interesting and mysterious.  It also costs a lot which means patients can&#8217;t do it on their own.  These are the reasons there has been much more research in LLLT for healing than LEDs and halogens: companies and researchers have expected more profit.  Light therapy is ancient and took on various new forms in the 1900&#8242;s before lasers were invented.  At least since </a>1989 definitive statements were being made in journal articles that lasers are not needed.  To quote the most recognized researcher in LLLT, Professor Tiina Karu: &#8220;An analysis of published clinical results from the point of view of various types of radiation sources does not lead to the conclusion that lasers have a higher therapeutic potential than LEDs. &#8230;The coherent properties of light are not manifested when the beam interacts with a biotissue on the molecular level&#8230;.The conclusion was that under physiological conditions the absorption of low-intensity light by biological systems is of purely noncoherent (i.e., photobiological) nature&#8230;.specially designed experiments at the cellular level have provided evidence that coherent and noncoherent light with the same wavelength, intensity, and irradiation time provide the same biological effect.  Successful use of LEDs in many areas of clinical practice also confirms this conclusion.&#8221; (Biomedical Photonics Handbook, 2003).  Thankfully, Dr. Karu is a Russian Professor so we can expect her research to be more honest and scientific compared to U.S. medical research based on corporate profit.  From a journal article: &#8220;&#8230;according to all available data, does not depend on the coherence of radiation.&#8221; Reference: &#8220;Photobiological Principles of Therapeutic Applications of Laser Radiation&#8221; published by Yu. A. Vladimirov, et al in Biochemistry (Moscow) Volume 69, Number 1 / January, 2004. <a name="other"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="other">Blue, Yellow, and Green</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="other">See the </a>skin section for information about how blue can help acne (it&#8217;s really violet, near UV-A) .  Blue is about 430 to 485 nm.  Green is 510 to 565 nm.  Yellow is 570 to 590. None of these penetrate the deeper than the skin.  See the skin section for how blue can help.  There are some companies that claim yellow helps remove wrinkles.  I haven&#8217;t found any research that&#8217;s not funded and conducted by the people who profit from it.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/skin_73_01.jpg" alt="" /></span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="design"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="design">Design info: Comparing LEDs</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="design">Designers trying to select LEDs or arrays will have trouble comparing LED brightness from different manufacturers.  The plastic encasings can focus the light and make mcd ratings much higher, but the amount of light coming out is the same.  A 100 mcd LED at +/- 10 degrees (20 degrees angle of output) has the same total amount of light output as a 2,000 mcd LED at +/- 5 degrees (10 degrees).  The equation is: Milliwatt output of an LED = mcd / (683 x P) x 2 x pi x (1-cos(1/2 Angle of output)).  Companies are not exactly consistent in how they measure mcd (millicandela) and the angle output.  Be careful in determining if they are stating 1/2 angle or full angle.  P is the &#8220;</a>photopic response factor&#8221; ( graph ) that depends on the wavelength.  mcd and P are only meaningful for visible wavelengths (not infrared). P=1 for 555 nm and P=0.061 for 660 nm.  For infrared, the measurement has to be mW/SR where SR=steradians.  SR units are the percentage of a sphere&#8217;s surface area, but divide SR by 4π (12.566) to get the percentage.  SR is to a sphere as radians are to a circle.  Replace mcd/(683 x P) with mW/SR for infrared LEDs.  In practice all this is not very useful.  You just have to buy the LEDs and compare them.  All 850 nm LED lamps I&#8217;ve tested had the exact same efficiency.  As a rough estimate, the light output energy of an LED is 30% of the input energy.  Strong LEDs use 50 to 100 mA continuously. But 20 mA red LEDs can put out enough light and are very common.  A good and strong 850 nm LED will use 50 mA continuously, but the device will get too hot if you pack the LEDs closely (22 LEDs per square inch for 5 mm packages) and run them anywhere near their max.  0.8 watts per square inch is the maximum energy you can apply to any device that touches skin unless a fan or heat sink is used in order to the skin temperature below 105 F (FDA guideline).  Kind of like a high fever on the skin, except the blood is able to take away the heat.  So at a typical spacing of 12 LEDs per in^2 (2 LED per cm^2) you can apply 66 mW per LED.  That&#8217;s 45 mA at 1.55 V for the common 850 nm lamp and 35 mA at 1.9 V for a good 660 nm.  LED spectrums can be generated with this spreadsheet.</span></p>
<p>Despite all the above, in directly measuring LED strength as described below, I measure only half the intensity reported by the datasheets. Datasheets report very roughly 1/3 of the energy input coming out as light output. I measure only half as much, 1/6th.<!--  850 nm 4 LED/cm^2 = 130 mW/cm^2 660 nm 4 LED/cm^2 = 60 mW/cm^2 660 nm 2 LED/cm^2 = 20ish mW/cm^2  --></p>
<p>You may think the following is crazy, so let me first say the results come out EXACTLY equal to the results expected for my quality assurance check, the Sun. So here it is: it&#8217;s possible for anyone to directly measure the light intensity of something using a styrofoam cup, cocoa powder, and a home digital thermometer (accurate to 0.1 or 0.2 degrees C), based on the heat capacity of water. The equation is: mW/cm^2 = 2 cm x C x 4.18 / seconds where 2 cm is the depth of water with dark cocoa powder to make it black water, C is increase in the water&#8217;s temp, 4.18 is converting from calories to Joules, and seconds is the time the light was applied (200 seconds works best for high power device, up to 600 seconds for typical low power). The styrofoam cup needs to be cut off at 3 cm and LEDs can&#8217;t be too close because air currents cause direct heating from the LEDs. For LED devices too small to cover the surface of the water, apply the light for longer amount of time and multiply the results by the water surface area divided by the surface area of the LED array. Do not take temp measurements in the sun or while the LED device is being applied because the metal absorbs the light and heats up. Water temp must be exactly at room temperature, or more precisely, ending water temp should be above room temp by the same amount that beginning temp was below room temp. Using this direct measurement method, I typically get <strong>half of what LED manufacturer&#8217;s spec sheets say</strong> and I know for self-consistency reasons that spec sheets are wrong. To calculate sun intensity at any time at any location on a sunny day, use this spreadsheet. I originally planned to use the Sun to calibrate this device and method, but it comes out so close to the predicted value for the Sun, no calibration or correction is needed.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/coffee_sun.jpg" alt="" /></span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="safety"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="safety">Safety Concerns</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="safety"><strong>Heat</strong> generation is the primary concern.  Skin temperature should never be more than 41 C (105.8F) to meet FDA regs.  There is no way to know how hot an array will get until it is wrapped as snuggly as possible.  No matter how &#8220;cool&#8221; a heat-producing device operates, if it&#8217;s wrapped good enough and long enough, it can get hot.  It&#8217;s not just how much energy goes in, but also how much goes out.  I&#8217;ve found around 0.8 Watts per square inch to be the maximum energy that can be put into a device that touches the skin without a fan or special heat sinking.  <strong>Eye Safety:</strong> Strong blue LED&#8217;s are dangerous to your eyes!  White LEDs have been studied for safety, but they have the harmful blue wavelengths in them.  Strong green LEDs have 1/15th the risk of blue.  Strong and focused Red and yellow LEDs appear safe, but I would not stare directly at them for more than a minute.  A 10,000 mcd 660 nm red could be dangerous.</a></span></p>
<p><a name="safety"><strong>The following section has contradictions and will be improved at a later date</strong><br />
<!--<br />
<span class="" id="_ctl74_cl" style="display:inline" mce_style="display:inline"> <a onclick="_ctl74_cl.style.display='none'; _ctl74_ex.style.display='inline'; return false; " href="#" mce_href="#" class="vl">Show more text about Eye Safety.</a></span><span class="" id="_ctl74_ex" style="display:none" mce_style="display:none"><a onclick="_ctl74_ex.style.display='none'; _ctl74_cl.style.display='inline'; return false; " href="#" mce_href="#" class="vl"><CENTER></p>
<hr /><b>Hide Text About Eye Safety</b></a><b>Eye Safety</b></CENTER> &#8211;><br />
The ACGIH does not seem to have a safety factor based on time of exposure (TLV) for simple LEDs, but it has two categories that can apply to them.  One is the TLV for laser light, but lasers are different because they focus the light in one spot which is much more likely to cause harm.  The link at the bottom of this paragraph is a well-researched article that strongly claims you don&#8217;t need to treat LEDs as lasers when it comes to safety.  The other TLV is for light at a range of wavelengths and time exposures.  Blue LEDs may harm the eyes from a photochemical injury called the &#8220;blue light hazard&#8221; that can cause loss of vision wherever the blue light strikes the retina.  Distance from such a narrow-beam, strong blue LED only makes the AREA of damage on your retina smaller, not that damage is less likely to occur.  Red, yellow, and green also have photochemical risks, but for LEDs, only green has the remote possibility of causing harm (if it&#8217;s high power with a narrow emission angle).  Bright visible light may also harm the retina from thermal activity.  Blue is thermally 10 times more dangerous than the others.  Reasonably powerful LEDs in red, yellow, and green are also thermally safe.  But they are brighter at narrow wavelengths than we have evolved to cope with, so I still consider staring at them for more than a minute to be risky.  Infrared light &gt; 770 nm may harm the retina and lens from thermal activity, but has more risk for the lens.  Damage to the lens may take the form mainly of cataracts.  Infrared should be less than 10 mW/cm^2 if it&#8217;s applied for greater than 15 minutes.  For less than 15 minutes, mW/cm^2 should be &lt; 1800 t^(-0.75).  This means 83 mW/cm^2 is safe to the the lens for up to one minute.  An excellent 50% efficient LED at its maximum power dissipation of 100 mW has 100&#215;0.50=50 mW light output, but if you shine it directly on the eye, it&#8217;s an exposure in an area of only about 5 mm in diameter, or 0.20 cm^2, so 50/0.2= 250 mW/cm^2 light intensity.  So by using the TLV equation above, it appears up to 15 seconds is safe when shining one of the most powerful types of 5 mm infrared LEDs directly to the eye.  So, it&#8217;s possible to increase the risk of cataracts when treating macular degeneration with red and infrared LEDs.  From another source: &#8220;Near-infrared thermal hazards to the lens (associated with wavelengths of approximately 800 nm to 3,000 nm) with potential for industrial heat cataract.  The average corneal exposure to infrared radiation in sunlight is of the order of 1 mW/cm^2.  By comparison, glass and steel workers exposed to infrared irradiances of the order of 80 to 400 mW/cm^2 daily for 10 to 15 years have reportedly developed lenticular opacities (Sliney and Wolbarsht 1980).  These spectral bands include IRA (700-1400 nm) and IRB (1.4 µm-3.0 µm).  In contrast to blue light, IR-A is very ineffective in producing retinal injuries (Ham, et al., 1982, 1976).  The American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) guideline for IRA exposure of the anterior of the eye is a time-weighted total irradiance of 10 mW/cm^2 for exposure durations exceeding 1,000 s (16.7 min) (ACGIH 1992 and 1995).  Pitts, et al. (1979) showed that the threshold radiant exposures to cause lenticular changes from IR-A were of the order of 5000 W*s/cm2.&#8221;  Note: For visible LEDs, Use L= 1000 x mcd/(683 x P) in place of L x (change in wavelength) in the TLV equations.  For infrared, use mW/(SR x 1000).  The distance from the LED does not change the danger for equations with L in them.  The reason for this is because the ACGIH values each and every rod and cone in the retina, and light from a further distance has the same strength for each rod and cone it hits &#8211; it is weaker only because it affects a smaller number of them.  See also </a>retinal eye safety (but they don&#8217;t address lens safety, do not give an mcd example for blue, and don&#8217;t discuss focusing that new LED plastic cases use).</p>
<p>Halogen lights contain a lot of blue light and are very dangerous to the eyes.</p>
<p><a name="sun"> </a></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="sun">Sunshine</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="sun">Bright sun at midday in the southern U.S. in summer has as much energy in the red and near-infrared (600-900 nm) as LED arrays (about 29 mW/cm^2 &#8211; see chart below which has an error in saying &#8217;39&#8242;).  But only about 50% of the light in the 600-900 nm range from the Sun is at the best wavelengths, so it requires mirrors and sunscreen to increase the amount of Sun to equal the best LEDs devices which have all their energy concentrated at the best wavelengths.  If mirrors are not used, treatment time is doubled or tripled to get the same benefit as a good LED device, but then getting hot becomes a problem if you don&#8217;t have a fan and a mist of water to keep cool. </a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="sun"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/SOLAR.gif" alt="" /></a></span></p>
<p><a name="sun"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/BLACK2.gif" alt="" /></a><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="heat"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="heat">Halogen, Incandescent, and Infrared Heat Lamps</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="heat">The Sun, Halogen lamps, incandescent lamps, and infrared heat lamps all emit light based on the black body radiation principle (see </a>this excel spreadsheet if you like physics).   Halogen lamps have a curve half way between the ones shown for incandescent and the Sun (see this chart). The Sun has 29% of its energy in the 600 to 900 nm range and halogens have 28%. Incandescents have 15% to 21% and heat lamps have about 10%.  Halogen, incandescent, and infrared heat lamps all heat up a metal filament of tungsten to produce light.  The filament &#8220;incandesces&#8221; which means it produces light by black body radiation.  The only difference is that a halogen gas can allow the filament to get hotter than regular incandescent bulbs and heat lamps have a cooler operating tungsten filament.  They operate at approx the following temperatures: Sun &#8211; 5780 K, halogen &#8211; 4100 K, incandescent &#8211; 2800 to 3200 K, heat lamp &#8211; 2400 K.  The cooler filaments emit more energy in the far-infrared which is easily absorbed by water which heats the water in the skin, concentrating the energy in a small volume of skin tissue that has pain and heat sensors.  This is how operating at a lower temperature can produce a stronger feeling of heat in the skin. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/BLACK.gif" alt="" /></span></p>
<p><strong>In summary, </strong> halogen lamps will produce light like the Sun and it can provide more light energy in the healing (tissue penetration) range of wavelengths than regular incandescent and heat lamps.  This will be much more energy than LEDs can provide and the energy will be spread out over a larger range of wavelengths (see chart above comparing LEDs and Sun).  The halogen is closer to the Sun&#8217;s natural spectrum.  Halogen lamps usually have glass covers that block UV light so that desk lamps do not cause sunburn to hands.  The strong blue wavelengths of halogens can be very harmful to the eyes.  As with typical LEDs that have about 30% efficiency in converting power input to light output, and as with the wide-spectrum of the sun, halogen lamps also put out about 30% of the energy they use as light energy in the tissue penetration range.  So a 50 W Halogen spot-light that concentrates it&#8217;s light in a 10&#215;10 cm area close to the bulb will produce 50*0.30/10^2= 0.16 W/cm^2 = 160 mW/cm^2 of light intensity in the tissue penetration range, but the heat from the far-infrared in the skin will be too powerful to keep it there for more than a few seconds.  This is about 3 times the best LED array and 5 times the healing range of sunlight.  To get as much light from a halogen as you can from very bright sun, simply compare the heat you feel from a halogen to the heat you would feel from the sun and the healing dosage should be about the same.  Plexiglass can block some of the far-infrared that heats the tissue.  Well-designed LEDs will not have the heat problem at all and are not supposed to be harmful to the eyes (I&#8217;m still researching it) which are two important reasons they are being used.  LEDs are more powerful over a short range of wavelengths which appears to be just as beneficial as having the wattage spread over a wider range of wavelengths as occurs with halogens and the Sun. Here are more comments on using halogen lights.</p>
<p>Halogen lights contain a lot of blue light and are very dangerous to the eyes.</p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/HAL_FOO3.jpg" alt="" /></span><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="pulse"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="pulse">Does Pulsing LEDs Help?</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="pulse">Some companies claim pulsing the light is important, but i haven&#8217;t seen any data to support it.  Pulsing increases the light at all depths for a brief period of time.  But a constant light source can provide the same amount of total light energy per minute when operated at lower intensity.  Pulsing probably does not provide more light per minute to the deeper tissue.  50 mW/cm^2 applied for half a second during each second of application will not provide more light at 1 cm depth than 25 mW/cm^2 applied for the full 1 second. It generates the same amount of heat.  There are four ways pulsing may help: </a></span></p>
<ol><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li><a name="pulse">If there is a &#8220;light power threshold effect&#8221; in cells.  By this I mean there could be something in tissue that requires a certain amount of &#8220;activation energy&#8221; to cause a reaction to occur.  But there is no research to support this. </a></li>
<li><a name="pulse">If there is something interesting in tissue that responds to certain rates of pulsing.  It would take an enourmous amount of clever research to determining what kind of pulsing is best (duration, waveform shape, and/or pauses). </a></li>
<li><a name="pulse">By flooding absorption sites in shallow tissue with short strong pulses, there may be a higher percentage of light energy available to deeper tissue. </a></li>
<li><a name="pulse">Pulsing may reduce some sort of instantaneous local heating of the LED chip that improves efficiency </a></li>
<p></span></ol>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="pulse">In summary, I know of ways it MAY help, but I do not have any data to support the idea.  I have seen 2 web sites claim that pulsing makes the LEDs more efficient, but the light output verses power input curves I have seen for typical LEDs indicate that being constantly on at a lower power input is slightly more efficient, probably due to having a lower operating temperature. If an LED is pulsed it has to have higher current to generate more light during the pulse to compensate for being off half the time and this could decrease efficiency, but item 4 above could still have larger positive effect.</a></span></p>
<p><a name="skin"> </a></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="skin">Skin: Wrinkles, Acne, Scars, and Spots</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="skin">Light devices that you can use at home are probably not going to reverse the signs of aging&#8230;at least not very much.  Red and infrared light helps injured cells a great deal, but wrinkles and scars are not injured cells.  I found only one journal article (see below) that indicated simple red and infrared light energy can help.  Please </a>email me if your skin has benefited from something you can use at home.</span></p>
<p><strong>Low Power Devices for wrinkles and aging:</strong></p>
<ul><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li>This article reported red (633 nm at 126 J/cm^2) and near-infrared (850 nm at 66 J/cm^2) for two treatments per week for 5 weeks resulted in 67% of the patients reporting good to excellent results.  Using sunscreen and two mirrors, you can face the noon-time summer sun for 1 hour 4 times a week to get the same treatment.  An $8 PAR38 75 W halogen light from WalMart can also do it in an hour for one side of the face.<!-- &nbsp;You buy an LED device (660 nm and 850 nm) <A HREF="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/FACE7B.jpg" mce_HREF="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/FACE7B.jpg">500 LED device</A> from me for $500 to treat the whole face in an hour. &#8211;></li>
<li>There&#8217;s an FDA-approved &#8220;Titan&#8221; device that uses strong infrared to tighten skin, available only through a doctor.</li>
<li>I saw an article claiming pulsed blue was good for wrinkles, but the research was so bad, I&#8217;m not providing the link. <!--
<li><A HREF="http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-130060851.html" mce_HREF="http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-130060851.html">DJ Goldberg</A> also reports pulsed (102 ms) 590 nm blue light for 60 seconds (4.5 J/cm^2) improved wrinkles and skin texture, but several comments in the article make me suspicious:  they stated only the &#8220;patented pulses&#8221; showed effect, 92% reported improvement (impossible), the contact&#8217;s web site sells all manner of skin treatment, T. Karu was not cited in the references, and 562-600 nm was erroneously reported as the best for CCO action (that&#8217;s for chlorophyll in plants, not people). &#8211;></li>
<li>See also non-ablative below (medium power devices that require a doctor visit)</li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Acne:</strong> Researchers (Tremblay, Morton) have used 48 J/cm^2 (20 minutes of 40 mW/cm^2) of 415 nm blue to treat acne vulgaris twice a week for 4 weeks (mild to <em>moderate</em> cases, propionibacterium acnes, but not Staphylococcus epidermidis).  They call it &#8220;blue&#8221; but it&#8217;s really a violet that borders on UV-A.  It would take 2 hours of the brightest sunlight without sunscreen (or one hour by using a mirror to double the light intensity) to equal the one of these 20 minute treatments.  Alternating red 633 nm once a week with blue 415 nm once a week may have worked better &#8220;particularly for papulopustular acne lesions&#8221; for mild to <em>severe</em> cases as reported by DJ Goldberg and SY Lee. P Papageorgiou used 415 nm and 660 nm.  Doses were always about 48 J/cm^2 for blue up to 100 J/cm^2 for red.  I would expect better results if they had used the red everyday and the blue twice a week, in addition to plenty of sunlight.</span></p>
<p><strong>Spots:</strong></p>
<p><strong>Non-ablative</strong> devices are not as serious in terms of risk as ablative (destructive) and they may soon be as good as the older ablative techniques.  The non-ablative devices usually use high-energy focused spots of laser light that cannot be duplicated by LED devices sold on the Internet.  Wavelengths from 500 to 3000 nm (blue to mid-infrared) have been used, but 1000 to 1500 is being researched the most.  These techniques are improving, but are still not as good as ablative.  Usually, between &amp;gt1000 nm and &lt; 1500 nm wavelengths, long or short pulsed, are used to heat the water in the skin to cause heat damage to the cells.  Therefore this technology is much different than the 600-900 nm healing wavelengths that the rest of this page is concerned with.  Studies have used three to eight treatments typically one month apart. Cryogenic cooling may also be used to minimize harm.  At Reliant Technologies, the ablative areas are a about 0.5 mm deep into the skin and twice as thick in diameter as a human hair. &#8220;Fractional rejuvenation&#8221; or &#8220;fractional photothermolysis&#8221; is the non-ablative version of the grid pattern used in ablative techniques.</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">Fractional photothermolysis (FP) has been recently introduced as a new concept in dermatologic laser medicine. FP employs an array of small laser beams to create many microscopic areas of thermal necrosis within the skin called microscopic treatment zones (MTZ). Even though FP completely destroys the epidermis and dermis within these MTZ, the 3-dimensional pattern of damage heals quickly and with few side effects. FP is currently used to treat fine wrinkles, photodamaged skin, acne scars, and melasma. Due to its clinical efficacy and limited side effects FP has established itself in the past two years as an alternative treatment modality to the conventional ablative and non ablative laser therapy. 2007 German article</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"> And here&#8217;s another review from 2006:</span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">Ablative lasers (CO2 and Er:YAG) provide the greatest improvement in photoaging, but significant adverse effects limit their use. Nonablative lasers have reduced adverse effects, but limited efficacy. Fractional photothermolysis (FP) produces arrays of microscopic thermal wounds called microscopic treatment zones (MTZs) at specific depths in the skin without injuring surrounding tissue. Wounding is not apparent because the stratum corneum remains intact during treatment and acts as a natural bandage. Downtime is minimal and erythema is mild, permitting patients to apply cosmetics immediately after treatment. As with other nonablative laser modalities, multiple treatments are required. FP represents an alternative for treatment of dermatologic conditions without the adverse effects of ablative laser devices and can be used on all parts of the body. FP can be used for the treatment of facial rhytides, acne scars, surgical scars, melasma, and photodamaged skin. </span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">To quote an outdated 2002 MedScape article to show the initial skepticism of non-ablative techniques 6 years ago: </span></p>
<blockquote><p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">Unfortunately, clinical data in support of nonablative lasers and light sources [including LED devices] for wrinkle and acne scar treatment remain unimpressive. Despite a series of lectures and dozens of research presentations dedicated to the subject, results at this year&#8217;s ASLMS often failed to impress the audience. Some before-and-after slides elicited puzzled expressions, while others triggered sporadic laughter. As one attendee murmured during a presentation, &#8216;I can&#8217;t tell any of the befores from the afters.&#8217;</span></p></blockquote>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"> Since this quote, many postive articles have been published. One study used 14 J/cm^2 with a 0.3 ms short pulse at 1064 nm for improving scars. Another used a combination of blue and infrared: 7 to 15 J/cm^2 with 7 to 50 ms pulses at 535 nm and 24 to 30 J/cm^2 with 30 to 65 ms pulses at 1064 nm. 1300 nm and 1500 nm lasers are also commonly used. </span></p>
<ul><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li>Abstract 4, 2007 Braun (flourescent and high-pulse non-ablative)</li>
<li>Abstract 5, 2007 Alster (radiofrequency non-ablative)</li>
<li>Abstract 6, 2007 DeHoratius (laser, infrared, and pulsed, all non-ablative)</li>
<li>Abstract 7, 2006 Ruiz-Rodriquez (non-ablative)</li>
<li>Abstract 8, 2004 Kim (non-ablative not yet as good)</li>
<li>Abstract 9, 2005 Freedman (combining ablative and non-ablative)</li>
<li>Abstract 10, 2004 Tanzi (1300 and 1500 nm non-ablative, scars)</li>
<li>Abstract 11, 2007 Keller (1064 nm non-ablative, acne)</li>
<li>Abstract 12, 2006 Lipper (1064 nm non-ablative)</li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><strong>Ablative </strong>(destructive) energy levels use lasers (also not available to patients for home use) that can destroy uneven pigment colors and cause the skin to heal itself in a way that reduces wrinkles. They have a recovery period that has to monitored by a dermatologist. &#8220;Fractional resurfacing&#8221; is a new ablative technique that applies the destructive energy in a close grid pattern that is not continuous, but alternates between harmed (ablated) and unharmed sections of skin. The unharmed cells help heal the adjacent ablated cells faster and better. More than one treatments can be used.<br />
<!--<br />
I don't think regular LEDs can do much signs of age, but I've made them special order, like this V-shaped 500 LED for $500 for the face (660 nm red).  Infrared and red LEDs are $1 per LED for custom designs. Blue, violet, green, yellow, and UV LEDs are $2 to $3 per LED for custom designs. I don't do flexible designs. Super-powerful designs with fans and special heat dissipation are $5 per LED (but 3 times more powerful per LED and 6 times more powerful per square inch).<br />
<CENTER><A HREF="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/FACE7B.jpg" mce_HREF="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/FACE7B.jpg"><img src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/FACE7Bs.jpg" mce_src="http://heelspurs.com/a/led/FACE7Bs.jpg"></A></CENTER> &#8211;> </span></p>
<ul><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"></p>
<li>Abstract 1, 2007 Mezzanna (ablative)</li>
<li>Abstract 2, 2007 Ruiz-Rodriquez (ablative)</li>
<li>Abstract 3, 2007 Jih (ablative)</li>
<li>Abstract 13, 2003 Lee (combining 535 and 1064 nm)</li>
<p></span></ul>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="misc"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="misc">Misc Comments</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="misc">In hindsight, we can say &#8220;people have always known sunlight is good for you&#8221;. It seems intuitively clear to most people that sunlight helps sick people and enables people to be more active. Now we know why from a chemical and biological viewpoint. Injured cells need the extra ATP, etc to repair themselves. Healthy cells generate enough ATP from the red and near infrared of sunlight to enable more activity. If the ATP is not used (as occurs when resting in bright sunlight) it causes an increase in available glucose for which causes a slight &#8220;glucose high&#8221; that causes relaxation and sleepiness we all feel after 30 minutes in the sun.  We know UV creates vitamin D that prevents colon, prostate, and breast cancer and greatly improves the immune system and bone strength. Skin cancer from UV is not a significant problem compared to the benefits of UV. The current fear of UV may cause more cancer than it prevents. 10 minutes a day of strong UV from summer sunlight is safe and the best source of vitamin D. </a><a name="journal"> </a></span></p>
<h3><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="journal">Effects of LED Light Therapy &#8211; Highlights of Journal Articles</a></span></h3>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="journal">&#8220;But if the rats were treated with LED light with a wavelength of 670 nm for 105 seconds at 5, 25 and 50 hours after being dosed with methanol, they recovered 95 per cent of their sight. Remarkably, the retinas of these rats looked indistinguishable from those of normal rats. &#8216;There was some tissue regeneration, and neurons, axons and dendrites may also be reconnecting,&#8217; says Whelan.&#8221; </a></span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"><a name="journal">&#8220;We believe that the use of NASA Light-Emitting Diodes (LED) for light therapy will greatly enhance the natural wound healing process, and more quickly return the soldiers to a pre-injury/ illness level of activity. The use of LED in combat with self-healing patches in future may enable the soldiers even after they are wounded to persist in combat better and longer.&#8221;<br />
</a>http://www.asc2002.com/Abstracts_only/d/DA-06.pdf</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;LED produced improvement of greater than 40% in musculoskeletal training injuries in Navy SEAL team members, and decreased wound healing time in crew members aboard a U.S. Naval submarine. LED produced a 47% reduction in pain of children suffering from oral mucositis. CONCLUSION: We believe that the use of NASA LED for light therapy alone, and in conjunction with hyperbaric oxygen, will greatly enhance the natural wound healing process, and more quickly return the patient to a preinjury/illness level of activity. &#8221; &#8220;ATS treatments improve sensation in the feet of subjects with DPN, improve balance, and reduce pain.&#8221;</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;list_uids=11776448</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;This technology may be the answer for problem wounds that are slow to heal&#8230;.diabetic skin ulcers and other wounds in mice healed much faster when exposed to the special LEDs in the lab. Laboratory research has shown that the LEDs also grow human muscle and skin cells up to five times faster than normal&#8230;.&#8221; </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;Light close to and in the near-infrared range has documented benefits for promoting wound healing in human and animals. &#8221;</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;dopt=Abstract&amp;list_uids=11568632</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;ATS treatments improve sensation in the feet of subjects with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, improve balance, and reduce pain.&#8221;</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;list_uids=14693984</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;Near-infrared irradiation potentially enhances the wound healing process, presumably by its biostimulatory effects.&#8221;</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;list_uids=11722751</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8221; It was found that laser exposure resulted in more pronounced restoration of functional state of nervous fibers than conventional therapy. Application of laser irradiation of low intensiveness was effective while in combined therapy of distal diabetic polyneuropathy as well as monotherapy.&#8221;</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;list_uids=9677693</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;exposure of volunteers to visible and infrared polarized (VIP) light leads to a fast increase in the growth promoting (GP) activity of the entire circulating blood for human KCs in vitro, which is a consequence of the transcutaneous photomodification of blood and its effect on the rest of the circulating blood volume.&#8221;</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;list_uids=14743286</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;list_uids=14521091 </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">&#8220;The method of monochromatic near infrared stimulation can be used for selective stimulation of several regions of the external auditory canal,..&#8221;</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;list_uids=14999583</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">LED and LLL irradiation resulted in an increased fibroblast proliferation in vitro. This study therefore postulates possible stimulatory effects on wound healing in vivo at the applied dosimetric parameters.</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;list_uids=12928819</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">Wound healing was significantly more rapid with than without FIR. Skin blood flow and skin temperature did not change significantly before or during far-infrared irradiation.</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&amp;db=pubmed&amp;list_uids=12773705</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">Although more studies are needed, LED therapy appears useful in the prevention of OM in pediatric BMT patients.</p>
<p>http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">News articles on the NASA Study:</p>
<p>http://garm.dyndns.org/whelan_lab/01/html/%20/whelan.html</p>
<p>http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM/news/releases/2000/00-336.html</p>
<p>http://healthlink.mcw.edu/article/975450257.html</p>
<p>http://www.hypography.com/article.cfm?id=29173</p>
<p>http://www.viahealth.org/via_news/news2002/april/woundstudy.htm</p>
<p>http://www.engr.wisc.edu/industry/atwork/vol5/WCSAR.html</p>
<p>http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/archives/D/archnas202.html</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">A wound-healing device was placed on the USS Salt Lake City submarine, and doctors reported 50 percent faster healing of crewmember&#8217;s lacerations when exposed to the LED light. Injuries treated with the LEDs healed in seven days, while untreated injuries took 14 days. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"> second daily infrared (JR) laser (820 nm, 25mW) and visible red laser (670 nm, 10 mW) at 1 J/cm2 and 5 J/cm2 on chronic pain. &#8230;five treatment sessions over a two-week period. &#8230;significant reductions in pain over the duration of the study with those groups which received infrared (820nm) laser a 1 J/cm2 and 5 J/cm2 </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">904 nm three times weekly for 2 weeks, &#8230;&#8230;tendonitis of the shoulder </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">3.5-inch by 4.5-inch (89-millimeter by 114-millimeter), portable flat array of LEDs, arranged in rows on the top of a small box. &#8230;&#8230;places the box of LEDs on the outside of the patient&#8217;s cheek about one minute each day. The red light penetrates to the inside of the mouth, where it seems to promote wound healing and prevent further sores in the patient&#8217;s mouth. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">All 176 patients received six treatments during a period of 3-4 weeks. ..GAAs laser therapy for tendinitis and myofascial pain </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">A 40 year-old woman presented at the Abe Orthopedic Clinic with a 2-year history of lower back pain and pain in the left hip and leg diagnosed as a ruptured disc between the 5th lumbar/1st sacral vertebrae. &#8230;..The gallium aluminum arsenide (GaAlAs) diode laser (830 nm, 60 mW) was used in outpatient therapy, and after 7 months, the patient&#8217;s condition had dramatically improved, demonstrated by motility exercises. This improvement was confirmed by further MRI scans, which showed clearly the normal condition of the previously herniated L5/SI disc. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"> Influence of low-level (810nm, GaAlAs semiconductor) laser on bone and cartilage during joint immobilization was examined with rats&#8217; knee model. &#8230;&#8230;.The hind limbs of 42 young Wistar rats were operated on in order to immobilize the knee joint. One week after operation they were assigned to three groups: irradiance 3.9W/cm2, 5.8W/cm2, and sham treatment. After 6 times of treatment for another 2 weeks both hind legs were </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">myofascial pain in the cervical region. The patients were submitted to 12 sessions on alternate days to a total energy dose of 5 J each. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;">RA:From July 1988 to June 1990, 170 patients with a total of 411 affected joints were treated using a GaAlAs diode laser system (830 nm, 60 Mw C/W). Patients mean age was 61 years </span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: arial; font-size: x-small;"> 890 nanometer (nm)&#8230;.Venous ulcers, diabetic ulcers, and post-amputation wounds&#8230;.It recently has been demonstrated that application of this particular MIRE device to the skin for 30 minutes increases plasma NO in nondiabetic subject volunteers, as measured with a Sievers Instrument, Model 280, Nitric Oxide Detector</span></p>
<p><strong>© 2008 heelspurs.com LLC<br />
Author: Scott Roberts<br />
scott@heelspurs.com</strong></p>
<p><a class="a2a_dd addtoany_share_save" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/wp-content/plugins/add-to-any/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" alt="Share/Bookmark"/></a> </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.ledtherapycenter.com/conditions-helped-by-led/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 49/59 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached

Served from: www.ledtherapycenter.com @ 2010-07-31 02:44:03 -->